Ciudadanía en el ámbito digital y las características destacadas de la personalidad conocidas como los Rasgos del Big Five
Palabras clave:
ciudadanía en línea, evaluación, características de personalidad, OCEAN, activismo en internetResumen
En las últimas dos décadas, internet ha evolucionado hasta convertirse en una plataforma vital para la expresión política, el desarrollo comunitario y el activismo social. Académicos de diversos campos se han esforzado por comprender y evaluar el impacto de estos cambios en las actitudes y comportamientos cívicos de las personas. La Escala de Ciudadanía Digital, tanto en su forma original como revisada, se ha convertido en una herramienta ampliamente utilizada para evaluar estas transformaciones. Sin embargo, ha existido una brecha significativa en la investigación que explora la relación entre los comportamientos de ciudadanía digital y variables externas. Este estudio aborda esta brecha utilizando el clásico modelo de los Cinco Grandes Factores de personalidad (Apertura a la experiencia, Responsabilidad, Extroversión, Amabilidad y Neuroticismo) para examinar cómo los rasgos de personalidad se corresponden con aspectos clave de la ciudadanía digital. Los resultados de la encuesta recopilados en tres países (n = 1820) revelaron que los rasgos de personalidad muestran asociaciones únicas con la ciudadanía digital en comparación con formas convencionales de participación cívica. Las implicaciones de estos hallazgos se discuten más a fondo.
Citas
Xenos, M.; Vromen, A.; Loader, B.D. The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2014, 17, 151–167. [CrossRef]
Phelps, E. Understanding electoral turnout among British young people: A review of the literature. Parliam. Aff. 2012, 65, 281–299. [CrossRef]
Furlong, A.; Cartmel, F. Social change and political engagement among young people: Generation and the 2009/2010 British election survey. Parliam. Aff. 2012, 65, 13–28. [CrossRef]
Dalton, R. Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. J. Political Stud. 2008, 56, 76–98. [CrossRef]
Pangrazio, L.; Sefton-Green, J. Digital rights, digital citizenship and digital literacy: What’s the difference? J. New Approaches Educ. Res. 2021, 10, 15–27. [CrossRef]
Ribble, M.; Miller, T.N. Educational leadership in an online world: Connecting students to technology responsibly, safely, and ethically. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 2013, 17, 137–145. [CrossRef]
Hui, B.; Campbell, R. Discrepancy between learning and practicing digital citizenship. J. Acad. Ethics 2018, 16, 117–131. [CrossRef]
Ali, I.; Butt, K.; Warraich, N.F. Factors effecting digital citizenship in education sector: A systematic review and future direction. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 1–33. [CrossRef]
Emejulu, A.; McGregor, C. Towards a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Crit. Stud. Educ. 2019, 60, 131–147. [CrossRef]
Heath, M.K. What kind of (digital) citizen? A between-studies analysis of research and teaching for democracy. Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. 2018, 35, 342–356. [CrossRef]
Theocharis, Y.; van Deth, J. The continuous expansion of citizen participation: A new taxonomy. Eur. Political Sci. Rev. 2018, 10, 139–163. [CrossRef]
Ohme, J. Updating citizenship? The effects of digital media use on citizenship understanding and political participation. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2019, 22, 1903–1928. [CrossRef]
Choi, M.; Glassman, M.; Cristol, D. What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Comput. Educ. 2017, 107, 100–112. [CrossRef]
Connolly, R.; Miller, J. Evaluating and Revising the Digital Citizenship Scale. Informatics 2022, 9, 61. [CrossRef]
Fernández-Prados, J.S.; Lozano-Díaz, A.; Ainz-Galende, A. Measuring digital citizenship: A comparative analysis. Informatics 2021, 8, 18. [CrossRef]
Choi, M.; Cristol, D.; Gimbert, B. Teachers as digital citizens: The influence of individual backgrounds, internet use and psychological characteristics on teachers’ levels of digital citizenship. Comput. Educ. 2018, 121, 143–161. [CrossRef]
Carmi, E.; Yates, S.J.; Lockley, E.; Pawluczuk, A. Data citizenship: Rethinking data literacy in the age of disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation. Internet Policy Rev. 2020, 9, 1–22. [CrossRef]
Polizzi, G. Information literacy in the digital age: Why critical digital literacy matters for democracy. In Informed Societies; Goldstein, S., Ed.; Facet Publishing: London, UK, 2020; pp. 1–23.
Mondak, J.J.; Hibbing, M.V.; Canache, D.; Seligson, M.A.; Anderson, M.R. Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 2010, 104, 85–110. [CrossRef]
Gerber, A.S.; Huber, G.A.; Doherty, D.; Dowling, C.M. The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 2011, 14, 265–287. [CrossRef]
Gerber, A.S.; Huber, G.A.; Doherty, D.; Dowling, C.M. The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 2011, 14, 265–287. [CrossRef]
McCrae, R.R.; Costa, P.T., Jr. The five-factor theory of personality. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research; John, O.P., Robins, R.W., Pervin, L.A., Eds.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
Russo, S.; Amnå, E. The personality divide: Do personality traits differentially predict online political engagement? Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2016, 34, 259–277. [CrossRef]
Gosling, S.D.; Rentfrow, P.J.; Swann, W.B., Jr. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J. Res. Personal. 2003, 37, 504–528. [CrossRef]
Soto, C.J.; John, O.P. Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. J. Res. Personal. 2017, 68, 69–81. [CrossRef]
Bakker, B.N.; Lelkes, Y. Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. J. Politics 2018, 80, 1311–1325. [CrossRef]
Phan, L.V.; Rauthmann, J.F. Personality computing: New frontiers in personality assessment. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2021, 15, e12624. [CrossRef]
Azucar, D.; Marengo, D.; Settanni, M. Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A metaanalysis. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2018, 124, 150–159. [CrossRef]
Ilmini, W.; Fernando, T. Computational personality traits assessment: A review. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, 15–16 December 2017; pp. 1–6.
Ahmad, H.; Asghar, M.Z.; Khan, A.S.; Habib, A. A systematic literature review of personality trait classification from textual content. Open Comput. Sci. 2020, 10, 175–193. [CrossRef]
Aung, Z.M.M.; Myint, P.H. Personality prediction based on content of Facebook users: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 2019 20th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), Toyama, Japan, 8–11 July 2019; pp. 34–38.
Vecchione, M.; Schoen, H.; Castro, J.L.G.; Cieciuch, J.; Pavlopoulos, V.; Caprara, G.V. Personality correlates of party preference: The Big Five in five big European countries. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2011, 51, 737–742. [CrossRef]
Himmelmann, G. Concepts and issues in citizenship education. A comparative study of Germany, Britain and the USA. In Education for Intercultural Citizenship; Alfred, G., Byram, M., Fleming, M., Eds.; Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK, 2006; Volume 13, pp. 69–85.
Weinschenk, A.C. Big five personality traits, political participation, and civic engagement: Evidence from 24 countries. Soc. Sci. Q. 2017, 98, 1406–1421. [CrossRef]
Cooper, C.A.; Golden, L.; Socha, A. The big five personality factors and mass politics. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2013, 43, 68–82. [CrossRef]
Ha, S.E.; Kim, S.; Jo, S.H. Personality traits and political participation: Evidence from South Korea. Political Psychol. 2013, 34, 511–532. [CrossRef]
Weinschenk, A.C. Personality traits and the sense of civic duty. Am. Politics Res. 2014, 42, 90–113. [CrossRef]
Dinesen, P.T.; Nørgaard, A.S.; Klemmensen, R. The civic personality: Personality and democratic citizenship. Political Stud. 2014, 62, 134–152. [CrossRef]
Lindell, M.; Strandberg, K. A participatory personality? Examining the influence of personality traits on political participation. Scand. Political Stud. 2018, 41, 239–262. [CrossRef]
Pruysers, S.; Blais, J.; Chen, P.G. Who makes a good citizen? The role of personality. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2019, 146, 99–104. [CrossRef]
Bentley, F.R.; Daskalova, N.; White, B. Comparing the reliability of Amazon Mechanical Turk and Survey Monkey to traditional market research surveys. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA, 6–11 May 2017; pp. 1092–1099.
Kees, J.; Berry, C.; Burton, S.; Sheehan, K. An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 141–155. [CrossRef]
Rammstedt, B.; John, O.P. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J. Res. Personal. 2007, 41, 203–212. [CrossRef]
Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; Becker, J.-M. SmartPLS 4. Available online: https://www.smartpls.com (accessed on 5 June 2023).
Hair, J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.; Gudergan, S. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016.
Chua, Y.P. A Step-By-Step Guide: PLS-SEM Data Analysis Using SmartPLS 4; Researchtree Education: Bolton, ON, Canada, 2022.
Wong, K.K.-K. Mastering Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-Sem) with Smartpls in 38 Hours; IUniverse: Bloomington, IN, USA, 2019.
Fornell, C.; Larcker, D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [CrossRef]
Hulland, J. Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strateg. Manag. J. 1999, 20, 195–204. [CrossRef]
Carmines, E.G.; Zeller, R.A. Reliability and Validity Assessment; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1979.
Hair, J.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2006, 87, 49–74.
Roets, A.; Cornelis, I.; Van Hiel, A. Openness as a predictor of political orientation and conventional and unconventional political activism in Western and Eastern Europe. J. Personal. Assess. 2014, 96, 53–63. [CrossRef]
Correa, T.; Hinsley, A.W.; Gil, H. Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection between users’ personality and social media use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 247–253. [CrossRef]
Brandstätter, H.; Opp, K.D. Personality traits (“Big Five”) and the propensity to political protest: Alternative models. Political Psychol. 2014, 35, 515–537. [CrossRef]
Mondak, J.J.; Canache, D. Personality and political culture in the American states. Political Res. Q. 2014, 67, 26–41. [CrossRef]
